Jul 15, 2025
Positive EV
How much to stake for Positive EV betting?
Staking is one of the most asked about questions when it comes to Positive EV betting. We cover everything you need to know and share with you the best staking strategy.RetryClaude can make mistakes. Please double-check responses.
One of the most common question we get when talking to people who are getting into Positive EV betting is how much should I stake.
In this comprehensive guide, we'll explore the key concepts of staking for positive EV betting, examine different approaches, and provide evidence-based recommendations to help you optimise your bankroll management strategy.
Key Concepts of Staking for Positive EV Betting
What is Positive EV?
Positive expected value occurs when the true probability of an outcome is higher than what the bookmaker's odds imply. For example, if you calculate a team has a 60% chance of winning, but the bookmaker's odds suggest only a 50% chance, you've found a positive EV opportunity.
We have put together a video explaining everything about Positive EV betting
The Importance of Bankroll Management
Even if you are getting positive EV bets, if you have a poor staking strategy you can crash out. Why it is important to think about your stakes in relationship to your bankroll size:
Risk of Ruin: The probability of losing your entire bankroll before achieving your profit goals
Bankroll Growth: Optimizing stakes to maximize long-term growth while managing volatility
Different Staking Approaches
Flat/Level Staking
How it works: Bet the same amount on every wager, typically 1-2% of your bankroll.
Advantages:
Simple to implement and track
Eliminates emotional decision-making
Makes it easy to calculate actual vs. expected ROI
Reduces detection risk from sportsbooks
Ideal for high-volume betting
Disadvantages:
Doesn't optimise for varying edge sizes
May miss opportunities to maximise growth
Slower bankroll growth compared to optimal variable staking
Kelly Criterion
How it works: Uses the formula f = (bp - q) / b to determine the optimal fraction of bankroll to bet based on your calculated edge, where:
f = fraction of bankroll to bet
b = net odds received (decimal odds - 1)
p = probability of winning
q = probability of losing (1 - p)
Advantages:
Mathematically optimal for maximising long-term growth
Adjusts stake size based on edge strength
Accounts for both probability and odds
Disadvantages:
Requires accurate probability estimates
Can recommend uncomfortably large stakes
High volatility and drawdown potential
Impractical for high-volume betting as need to constantly be calculating your updated bankroll and plugging numbers into a calculator
In the Betsniper Positive EV tool we have the Kelly criterion automatically built in. So you just input your bankroll and multiplier and for each bet we will calculate your optimise stake
Fractional Kelly
How it works: Bet a fraction (typically 25-50%) of the Kelly Criterion recommendation.
Advantages:
Reduces volatility while maintaining growth optimization
More psychologically comfortable
Lower risk of ruin
Accounts for estimation errors
Disadvantages:
Still requires accurate probability calculations
More complex than flat staking
Can still recommend large stakes in high-edge situations
Fixed Percentage Staking
How it works: Bet a fixed percentage (usually 1-5%) of your current bankroll on each bet.
Advantages:
Automatically adjusts to bankroll changes
Simple to calculate
Built-in risk management
Disadvantages:
Constant recalculation needed
Doesn't account for varying edge sizes
Can be impractical for frequent betting
Target EV Staking
How it works: Adjust stake size to achieve a consistent expected value from each bet, typically 2-3% of bankroll.
Advantages:
Maintains consistent expected growth
Accounts for varying odds
Reasonable risk management
Disadvantages:
More complex calculations
Requires accurate edge estimation
Variable stake sizes may
Which staking strategy should I use?
The two most common approaches are using the Kelly Criterion or Flat Staking. These are the simplest and the most effective strategies.
Pro-Flat Staking Arguments
Easier to implement and maintain discipline
Reduces bookmaker detection risk
Faster bet execution - crucial for catching edges before lines move
Eliminates need for constant bankroll recalculation throughout the day
More psychologically comfortable during losing streaks
Allows easy tracking of actual vs expected ROI
Better suited for high-volume betting (15+ bets per day)
Reduces impact of probability estimation errors
Pro-Kelly Arguments
Adjusts for varying edge sizes
Mathematically proven to maximize long-term growth
Accounts for both probability and odds in stake calculation
Theoretically optimal for bankroll growth efficiency
Can significantly outperform flat staking when edges are accurately estimated
Our take
If you are going to having a low volume of bets, you may benefit from the additional edge you can get from optimising individual bet sizes using Kelly Criteria. If you are going to use the Kelly Criterion, we would recommend applying a multiplier as without one the staking can be quite aggressive as well as never betting more than 5% of bankroll on any bet.
However, for most people implementing a Positive EV betting strategy. Your best approach is to flat stake. The best results from positive EV betting come from volume. We just want to play whenever there is EV and let variance play out in the long-run. The more we can bet the more return we can make. By flat staking, you can easily get lots of bet down and avoid detection from bookmakers of any sophisticated approach. If you are flat staking, an easy place to start is 1% of your bankroll. By betting 1% and taking consistently EV bets, there is close to no chance that you will crash out.
There have been many studies that illustrates when you have a systematic edge-finding process (i.e. Betsniper), placing many smaller bets consistently outperforms trying to identify a few "sure thing" opportunities.
Betsniper’s take: if you are implementing a high-volume positive EV betting strategy, which we say is the best strategy, then you should opt for betting 1% of your bankroll per bet
You can also still adjust your stakes up if the odds are lower and the EV is large. And vice versa if the odds are higher, you can lower your stake. However, we still recommend just keeping the same stake size to remove decision-making and keep you consistent.
Want to speak to a positive EV betting expert?
We have been playing positive EV betting strategies for 10+ years and have netted $200,000+ in profit over this period. We are offering free consulting call (normally valued at $299) for customers who sign up to our free 7-day trial.
Answer all your questions about positive EV betting
Share our insights and strategies that we use to make money from positive EV betting today
Formulate a personalised plan that fits around your risk appetite, bankroll and lifestyle
If you would like to learn how to implement a positive EV betting strategy, please book in a call here.

Get access to cutting-edge technology as well as a helpful community to help you start making smart decisions when you are betting.